Sun Schools
Jane Ames
We appreciate the many letters we are receiving from you who want the County to continue to fully fund the Sun School Program. We are looking into the issue and invite thoughts about Sun School programs, as well as ideas about strategically selecting where to make cuts when reductions are required. We struggle with how our community is to endure tough choices when the resources don’t meet the demands.
The City has fully funded its commitment to the Sun School program; County leaders are struggling among themselves whether to fully fund or cut $1.7 million of the program’s funding.
No one has made a case that the Sun School Program is not valuable, nor has anyone dismissed the importance of the extended-day programming that provides positive safe activities and academic support.
The case is being posed that cuts have to be made, and this is one place the County can make reductions. According to this view, the County funds similar services to these populations through other programs, and the $1.7 million reduction will impact administration rather than direct services.
The countering perspective is that the Sun School Program is a nationally lauded program with a proven record of strong outcomes and measurable results for hi-risk and low-income children and families, and that the drastic cut will eliminate direct services for approximately 10,000 students.
Please read the linked articles and let us hear your ideas.
SUN Schools has been recognized nation-wide as a premiere asset-based prevention model targeting at-risk or low-income children and families. A recent independent evaluation of SUN by the Northwest Regional Education Laboratory (NWREL) showed strong outcomes and measurable results for children and families served by the program.
SUN Schools are an important piece of the youth and school-related programs funded by Multnomah County, but are only one part of a sweeping set of County programs designed to support children and their families.
Multnomah County commissioners Monday faced a sidewalk demonstration and an evening of emotional testimony from backers of Schools Uniting Neighborhoods, a community schools and social service program that has been targeted for a $1.7 million budget cut.
Posted by Jane Ames on June 15, 2006
(2) Comments | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
Filed Under Education, Front Page, LPSCC
Comments by site visitors
Larry,
Responding to your questions:
#1: I have not read the report itself. From the materials I have read the criteria they speak of are quite a bit beyond how many they serve. It is about the improvement in school attendance, completetion of assignments (as in homework), and improvement in their achievement.
How they are able to tie those impacts directly to Sun School participation I do not know; it could be there are many integrated efforts all helping students achieve.
#2: This answer is from my perspective having worked in school programs, after school programs and efforts and such. We feed students because some do not get enough to eat at home, or they are rushed to school so parents can get to work and breakfast gets skipped or isn't adequate to get them through day.
When students are hungry it is hard to concentrate on school. So feeding kids is a very effective tool in helping students succeed in school.
And feeding kids in after school programs provides the after school nourishment that most kids need, and again helps them settle in and study.
I can understand why you might think it isn't a logical link, but I think feeding kids is a very valid and important use of our funds.
Thank you for writing and for asking questions.
Jane
Posted by: Jane Ames | Jun 16, 2006 3:52:42 PM
Post your comment
Please note: your email address, although required to post, will not be visible. We remove inappropriate or offensive content, and content deemed improper by State and City election and ethics law. The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of the office or the City of Portland.
Jane/Sam/whoever is reading this:
In general, I support the SUN programs. However, I have 2 concerns:
1) You wrote: A recent independent evaluation of SUN by the Northwest Regional Education Laboratory (NWREL) showed strong outcomes and measurable results for children and families served by the program." So what exactly ARE the measurable results? And I wouldn't consider a headcount of the number of people who accessed the programs to be a result (that would be like listing the number of people entering high school as a "result" of Portland School District). So what are these measurable results?
2) Why are we feeding people under this program? Like I said, I support SUN and I like the ideas of activities for the kids during the summer, but I don't understand how it became a meal program. Seems to me that we could extend the program in more locations if we could eliminate that cost, thereby reaching more kids.
Thanks, Larry
Posted by: Larry | Jun 16, 2006 8:05:42 AM