Home | Sam's Calendar | Sam's Priorities | Sam's Portfolio | I Want To... | Your Neighborhood | Archives

Radio Comments Against Cyclists

An open Letter to City of Portland:

It has been brought to my attention by several concerned members of the community that the 95.5 radio broadcast of “The Playhouse” on July 13, 2006 and July 16, 2006 included a number of inflammatory statements that could negatively impact the safety of Portland. These statements may have included sentiments that news of people dying is funny. It is not. The discussion included statements to the effect of:

“When I hear on TV that a cyclist has been hit and killed by a car, I laugh; I think it’s funny,

“If you are a cyclist you should know I exist, that I don’t care about you. That I don’t care about your life.”

Upon first becoming the Commissioner of Transportation, I set traffic safety as my number-one priority. I believe that one death on our roads is one death too many, and in Portland, we have 10% more traffic fatalities each year than murders. Last year in America (I note that the show in question is broadcast in 12 markets), 43,200 people died in traffic crashes. This was more than any year since 1990. If the USA had shared the same success in reducing fatality rates as Australia, England, and Canada, we would have had 20,000 fewer dead people last year.

It is in this light that I wish to express my extreme concern for the statements in your show that made light of the tragedy that visits families coping with the aftermath of traffic casualties. This past year alone has brought us here in Portland an unacceptable number of tragic pedestrian and bicycle fatalities – fatalities of mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, husbands and wives. While making light of these tragedies exhibits poor taste, the main concern I hold is that the broadcast may have actually encouraged people to behave in reckless and dangerous ways towards others. While I am a strong defender of freedom of speech, incitement to violence is not afforded the same protections as other types of speech.

Through our “I Share the Road” campaign, the City is working to combat road rage and promote safety and tolerance through education, engineering, and enforcement strategies that relate to motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. This effort is led by a coalition that includes the Oregon Truckers’ Association, AAA of Oregon, the Bicycle Transportation Alliance, the Willamette Pedestrian Coalition, Trauma Nurses Talk Tough, Elders in Action, and others. We take increasing the civility on our streets seriously. As a coalition, we have pledged to challenge statements that trivialize or dehumanize the effects of road rage.

I have had a chance to listen to some edited versions of the broadcasts in question, and am shocked by some of the inappropriate commentary I have heard. However, since the Jamn 95.5 has taken the full versions of the broadcasts off of their website’s public archives I have not had the opportunity to hear the entire unedited broadcasts. Because of this, I am calling on the 95.5 management to cooperate with community requests and provide a transcript, tape, or the podcast of the show to the public. This action would either alleviate community concerns or help to foster a dialogue about the appropriate actions 95.5 could take to assist in efforts to improve the safety of our streets.

I hope to do what I can to help turn this seemingly unfortunate incident into a constructive event that may lead to something positive within our community. I look forward to continuing my work with transportation advocates of all sorts, as well as radio staff, in the case that I can be of additional assistance.

Thank you,

Sam Adams
Commissioner of Transportation
City of Portland



Sam, Thank you for

Sam, Thank you for addressing this. It is completely disturbing that people can trivialize the lives of other people in such a way as this. Laughing at other people dying! I just can't believe this.

I know there have been many heated debates on this blog about spending on bicycle infrastructure, but it's been just that: debate, i.e. healthy public dialog. And I think we're all better for it, because these debates introduce us to other people's thought processes and allow us to talk about them. But this DJ - man. Just absolutely zero tolerance or understanding for people who choose to live differently than him. And the crazy thing is that we're simply talking about the choice of a mode of transportation!

Again, Sam, thanks for addressing this. 95.5 needs to at least own up to the hate that they're airing, and make ammends. How 'bout a 95.5-sponsored bike trail??


Wow Sam. I think I

Wow Sam.

I think I understand the point of the 95.5 broadcast.

The city, state, and even feds have made many people believe that bicycles are the equivalent to a 2,000lb+ car. They (meaning you) constantly tell us it’s an "alternative" to driving and they do everything they possibly can to promote this "alternative."

Fact is, motor vehicles are larger, heavier, and travel much faster then any bicycle, yet they are expected to share the road. Since bikes are more maneuverable then cars, most bicyclists ignore major traffic laws (like stopping at a stop sign). This only multiplies the problem.

Bicycles and motor vehicles do not mix. ANY person dumb enough to take a bicycle out into fast moving traffic (including the un-used bike lanes on the east side) is just asking to be killed.

Instead of listening to hip-hop radio broadcasts for hate speech against a super-minority transportation mode, maybe you should do your job and start doing things that actually fix transportation problems (like widening streets, completing sidewalks, timing traffic lights, and removing bubble curbs).


WOW Anthony is REALLY fired

WOW Anthony is REALLY fired up. BTW Anthony, I'm not for certain but I'm pretty sure this issue was brought to Sam's attention and demanded some comment vs. Sam sittin' back at his desk drinking a cafe' latte listening to the morning show at jamming 95 or what ever station it is. Lighten up......


"super-minority"!?!?

Hi Anthony. Welcome to the biggest bike city in North America. I use East-side bike lanes everday, as do thousands of people in this town. Think the streets are too narrow now? I wonder how they'd fit if all those people drove cars all the time, like you. Let's race accross town sometime during rush hour and see how fast your big bad car is then.

Get a clue,

Jason


I don't think we would have

I don't think we would have much to worry about if 1000 people throughout the Portland area decided to give up their bikes and drive.

And for the 15 years I have lived on the east side (east of I-205), I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen a bicyclist using the lane properly (meaning going the same direction as traffic, staying in the lane, etc). Why can’t the bike/park lanes be striped to traffic lanes and the bikes stay on the sidewalk?

Where does the CoP get their bike numbers? I am willing to bet the total number of people who use a bike as their primary mode of transportation is less then 2500.


Don't let "Anthony's" blog post distract us from core issue...

You only encourage jackasses like him by letting him distract this conversation. Ignore him.


Name calling- The way a

Name calling- The way a liberal defends his point of view when he or she knows the other point of view is right.


Anthony's reply

Anthony, maybe you should get your head out of your ass. You obviously know zilch about transportation issues. I look forward to seeing your abandoned car in 10 years when we're out of affordable petrol (except for the wealthy) and you're walkin' your dumb ass everywhere.
If you do ever get your head out of your ass long enough to read something besides the sports section, you'd know that Portland is planning for the future. The citizens of the city, not the suburbs, will survive peak oil while others will really be in trouble.


Peak Oil

I thought peak oil was going to happen 30 years ago. What happened?


That was for U.S. oil

That was for U.S. oil production, and yes it happened over thirty years ago in 1971. Global production is projected to peak sometime between 2005 and 2020, depending on who's doing the predicting.


Thank you

Thank you Sam for taking this issue head on.

I only hope that something positive can come out of this. A healthy discussion upholding the value of human life would be a good start - especially in light of recent events going on in the world.


Bikes are vehicles

As a student, professional, taxpayer, and bicycle commuter in the City of Portland, this debate needs more attention.

Bicycles reduce the demand for gasoline, making gas for those who drive cheaper. Bicyclists don't pollute, so the air drivers breathe is just a bit cleaner. Bicyclists don't take up space on the road, so they make traffic lighter.

I bicycle commute downtown every day. I obey the laws (even those which our friend Anthony doesn't know - such as passing on the right when safe). I thank drivers who obey the law (don't kill me). Those who don't have no mercy - you don't want to cut me off in my bike lane.

Bicyclists need to obey the laws, too, and I publicly chide those that don't as well. Bicyclists who don't stop at crosswalks, stop signs, traffic lights make people like Anthony more jaded, angry, and make it riskier for me to be a victim of his road rage.

Finally, I think everyone should also know the rules of the road - the law. It would at least give us a level field to at least start the dialog: http://www.stc-law.com/pdf/Pedal_Power_Jun19.pdf

-Dan Richardson
Cyclist, Motorcyclist, and even driver


Cheers!

Thanks for your thoughtful comments and reminders, Dan!

As a cyclist, I make every effort to obey the rules of the road and am saddened when I see fellow two-wheelers turn scofflaws (esp in front of youth and car owners).

While stopped at a stoplight or stop sign, I've been personally taken to task by drivers infuriated by misdeeds of our fellow cyclists (the fact that I bike safely has often seemed immaterial to road-weary drivers at these times).

I've appreciated the opportunity to help educate those with whom we share the road (although saddened -- and even afraid for my safety -- at such anger I've seen).

Anthony is right -- a 14lb bike is no match for a 2000lb+ auto and I doubt there's a biker around who hasn't felt a twinge of terror when they near an angry driver's path.

I would encourage bikers and car owners alike to visit some of the many resources for sharing the road safely and responsibly.

ODOT's Bicyclist Safety Program
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TS/bicyclistsafety.shtml#Program_Introduction

Department of Public Safety & Oregon State Police
http://oregonstate.edu/dept/security/bike_safety/

Share the Road Safely
http://www.sharetheroadsafely.org/

Many thanks to the many who share the road responsibly and with courtesy.


Voice of Reason & Parity

Sam,

Have you ever been going down the interstate at the posted speed, and from out of nowhere another vehicle blows past you going 90 plus. Then about five miles down the road, that vehicle has been pulled over. It happened to me and some friends heading north a few months ago. A bright yellow low slung econo-box roared past. A few miles down the road, flashing lights, and like most people, we all had good chuckle. I have also been downtown when bicyclists come from out of nowhere, zipping in between cars and then as far as the eye can see, blowing through all the red lights down the street ahead of the rest of the traffic. The difference is the bicyclists are never stopped and there is no last laugh because the City tends to look the other way when it comes to bicyclists breaking traffic laws. Proof positive of a double standard is the free headlights handed out by law enforcement to the bicyclists instead if issuing citations when the bicyclists are caught after dark without proper lighting.

Yes, I agree that a fatality of any kind is not funny; however one avenue of thought is that the bicyclists themselves have brought this on with their own arrogant attitude. There is hardly a day that goes by that I do not observe bicyclists blowing past stop signs, running red lights, making illegal turns and/or just in general violating some traffic law. And again yes, motorists do some of the same things, but more by oversight than doing it with the repeated arrogance of bicyclists who think they are above the law. At your safety summit, one law enforcement officer commented that on average bicyclists are far more abrasive than motorists when he issued citations. Add to that the mass demonstrations ballyhooed as bicycle awareness rides, but masking their true purpose of creating disruption and civil disobedience. Arrogantly the organizers will not get permits.

Also Sam, you and many other politicians who should be equally representing the users of all modes of transport, including stakeholder taxpaying motorists, totally reject any open public conversation or a vote of the people that sharing the road must also mean sharing the financial responsibility, with the aim of taxing the bicycle mode of transport for bicycle infrastructure and the government services received. You and others also appear to support and even encourage the barrage of verbal missile attacks and name calling bicyclists make against motorists and the anti-automobile oratory. “One less car” is one less taxpayer for the roads. Even those types of statements are insults when coupled statements you have made like the “gas tax has not been raised since whenever.” Your own Senior Transportation Policy Advisor has demonstrated through his posts on this blog his one-sidedness and favoritism towards bicyclists with bias and prejudice towards motorists. Your office is fueling what could be described as a mid-east war between the bicycle mode and the motorist mode.

Although making funny of a fatality is going too far, so has your office with all the bicycle babble rhetoric and preferences. This radio broadcast is the verbal missile being fired back. If you truly want to have these types of remarks discontinued, a change in your attitude and mindset is in order. Adopt a get tough bicycle enforcement policy with bicycle stings where bicycle offenders are issued citations for violating traffic laws. Start listening to motorists and include them with direct representation at the transportation project advisory table. Organize an auto-commuter and motorist summit to hear motorist ideas. Be open to and have a public conversation about the merits of a bicycle tax Then let the voters decide the issue. The more you and your office opens up to and listens to the needs of motorists, be it stopping the proliferation of curb extensions or not having busses stop for passengers in travel lanes (I just had to get those in), the more harmony will exist between modes of transport.


Taxing cyclists

I am all for taxing cyclists as long as it is proportional. Semi truck drivers pay more tax than drivers of cars because they take up more space and damage the roadway. Let's tax on bicycles space occupancy, which is extremely minimal, and damage to the roadyway which is nonexistent, which means there really is no point in taxing them because it is too small an amoung to effectively collect. While comments are articulate and respectful, they are also misgiuided. Please do some research on what it costs to establish and maintain a paved dedcated pathway versus a street. There is no comparison in the per mileage cost. Do some research on how much damage SUVs, Hummers, and full size cars with studded tires do to streets and highways. Then do research on what a municipality gains financially by promoting cycling and reducing single occupancy vehicle traffic; it is astounding. I won't quote here, I'll let the smart conservative politcal wonks do their own research. I like to see them gaping mouthed when they find the truth. The bottom line is the municipality, convervative or liberal, comes out (cha-ching) ahead financially when more people ride their bikes. My suggestion is instead of taxing cyclists, the City of Portland should encourage cycling by paying cyclists to use bicycles on the streets rather than destroying them with cars and trucks. Cheers.


For starters, a bicycle lane

For starters, a bicycle lane in each direction takes up about the same amount of space as one motor vehicle travel lane. Therefore on a two lane street with parking on each side about 20% of the street is reserved for bicycle travel that is not available for motorists use. Whether or not the bicycle lane is being used, the bicycle lane is still taking up pavement space on the roadway and must be maintained. Therefore bicyclists using the bicycle mode of transport should be required through a user fee or tax to cover the costs for 20% of a roadway of this design. Similar formulas would apply for streets of greater or lesser motor vehicle lanes. Add to that the Eastbank esplanade, the Springwater trail and other non-motorist infrastructure and the bicycle toll goes up.

Then, lest we not forget how freeways also benefit bicyclists. Freeway improvement projects that add motor vehicle capacity benefit all users of local streets and roads (including bicyclists) by reducing traffic counts on them. Less traffic on local streets can easily be viewed as making them safer for bicyclists who for the most part ignore common traffic laws like stop signs, traffic signals and often dart in and out of traffic and between cars when streets are congested such as in downtown Portland. Therefore since bicyclists do benefit from highway projects, maybe bicyclists should be taxed to help pay for new highway interchanges and capacity in addition to being taxed for bicycle infrastructure. Ding-a-ling, the bell tolls it is time for a bicycle tax.


What an idea! Brilliant!

What an idea! Brilliant! Bike tax! So smart! Why haven't you mentioned this before? Let's get on it!


tax tax tax and MORE TAXES

It's great to hear conservatives demand more taxation and more government to collect those taxes. Are you sure you are not trying to back door some of these taxes to George's ill planned war? Let's hear it for tax and spend conservatives!!!!!!


Terry, You are wrong.

Terry,
You are wrong. Portland police pull over bike riders and give them tickets. How do I know this? I have been pulled over downtown on my bicycle and given a $230 ticket for running a red light. Other people I know have gotten tickets on their bicycles in Portland for not signaling lane changes and DUI for biking while drunk. So your entire premise is wrong. Bicyclists in Portland are subjected to the same laws as motorists, and contribute to city coffers by paying their tickets.

-zio


Reason and parity, indeed

Terry,

I find your rhetoric overheated. Bikes and motor vehicles both have to follow all the rules of the road. That is what I said at the transportation safety summit that is how I lead PDOT. For example, recently I did a crosswalk enforcement sting. We ticketed both bikes and motor vehicles that violated the crosswalk rules.

Even the most casual observer can see we have a problem with road safety in this city that includes pedestrians, bikes and motorists.

I see plenty of room for all modes of travel to improve regarding operator safety.

Most of PDOT's funds go to motor vehicle investments. Terry, you already know that. Getting more people on bikes reduces congestion and has other great benefits to society.

Terry, I like having your point of view included my site. But I need you to reduce the length, number and repetition of your posts on my site. You do not need to comment on each post.

Thanks,

Sam


BICYCLISTS HIT BY CARS

YES....IT IS FUNNY BIKERS ARE HIT BY CARS...I guess this is the same disregard for life that helps enable the bombing and slaughter of people and the entire planet!