CHINA BLOG: Keeping Direct Passenger and Cargo Air ConnectionsBy Sam Adams
10:45 pm, Friday, September 5, 2008 On April 14, 2008, Northwest Airlines also known as ‘NWA' announced it intended to merge with Delta Air Lines. If approved, the newly combined airline will be called ‘Delta Air Lines,' and become the largest air carrier in the world. This merger news is of potential significance to the Portland region. Along with a half-dozen direct domestic connections, the NWA routes provide PDX with three key direct international air connections with Busan, Korea, Tokyo, Japan and Amsterdam, Netherlands. The recent merger news also has some anxious Portland history behind it too. From 1988 to 2001, Delta operated flights from PDX to Tokyo and other Asia cities. So, does the NWA and Delta airline merger put the Portland's NWA routes to Asia at risk? So far, so good. But with the severe turbulence in the airline industry Portland and Oregon cannot afford to take anything for granted. To that end, tonight I had dinner with Sandeep Bahl, NWA's China General Manager and his sales manager Mandy Zhou. Building the China/Portland air passenger and cargo market has been their task. Given that Portland is not well known in China, Sandeep and his team have done a great job helping grow the number of NWA trips between China and PDX through Tokyo. Sandeep said that many Chinese leisure visitors to the U.S prefer in a single trip to travel to a group of cities on the west or east coasts (until now China has issued travel visas to the U.S. for only business trips and tour operated group trips but that is expected to soon change). Like many travelers, the average Chinese like great sightseeing, good food and shopping options; Portland excels at all three, said Sandeep. Especially as a beginning or ending point for visitors from China. Our big secret weapon? No sales tax -- effectively providing shoppers a six to twelve percent discount on purchases (Sandeep said that many China-made products are cheaper to buy in U.S. than in China were they are heavily taxed). What should Portland be doing to bolster our air world passenger and cargo direct connections? Sandeep advised to grow your economic connections to China, increase visitor marketing to China and Asia and the world and see Portland on the ground through the eyes of the potential visitor, "I loved that I could ride the light rail from PDX to my downtown hotel for $2.30 and that the signage included directions in Chinese." 晚上好 Posted Sat, 09/06/2008 - 12:40am.
[[ Categories: Jobs & Economy ]]
Portlander Hater AlertSubmitted by Ted J. on Sat, 09/06/2008 - 4:29pm.
Steve, You always try and pass yourself off as this average small business voter type when in reality you are from the right wing of the non-Portland Republican party who has opposed almost everything that Portland is now lauded for. Your auto-oriented, pro-sprawl at all-cost approach is bankrupt. You are quick to blog these kind of rhetorical snide warped personal attacks on Democrats and Portlanders. Sam is out trying to promote Portland and Portland businesses (paid for by NLC as I understand it) in China and all you can do is throw juvenile spitballs. Yes, you have made yourself clear. TJ » reply
I have to disagreeSubmitted by Steve on Sun, 09/07/2008 - 7:37am.
If fixing roads, keeping water/sewer rates at reasonable levels, allowing the Sellwood bridge not to fall into the Willamette and have good schools is rhetorical snide, tehn we do have a basic problem in this town. If you have somehting more substantive than calling names, fine, but we are facing a large infrastructure issue. Meanwhile, city council goes off on trips and thinks about distractions like art districts and streetcars or baseball/soccer stadiums. We have the money to fix basics (at least $30M a year in excess revenue the past 5 years), so why not fix what all people, regardless of political orientation, use everyday first? » reply
Growing Portland's Economic BaseSubmitted by Sam Adams on Sun, 09/07/2008 - 3:48pm.
Steve: I believe growing our economic base is key to rebuilding Portland's basic infrastructure. The more successful our local companies are at selling their goods and services around the globe, the more businesses profits and jobs at home and the government revenues to build and maintain infrastructure and operate our schools. In terms of the $30 million excess city revenues in the past four years you mention, about 20% went to basic street maintenance and safety projects (a 100% increase). In addition, using the coming energy tax windfalls, last month, the City Council doubled its ongoing general fund commitment to street and bridge maintenance. Getting these recent funding increases for basic transportation services approved was challenging. I missed seeing you weigh in with your support for them. I encourage you to do so in the future. Sam » reply
Great we agreeSubmitted by Steve on Sun, 09/07/2008 - 7:17pm.
"growing our economic base" I agree with you. What did you get from this China trip and the previous European trips that will be applied to growing businesses here in Portland instead of having them move out of town? » reply
Read my blog posts, Steve...Submitted by Sam Adams on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 1:32am.
...By the way, one way you can help us focus more money on our $433 million transportation safety and maintenance backlog is to stand with us in opposing expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary. We need to fix the crumbling regional transportation system we already have and not waste it trying to keep up with more sprawl. Sam » reply
Competition for Limited Transportation ResourcesSubmitted by Sam Adams on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 9:48pm.
Steve: It is about competition for limited transportation tax resources. Do we use the limited transportation resources on hand to better maintain the streets and bridges that already we have in the region; or, do we use our transportation resources to build news streets and roads to connect to the new developments at the edge of sprawl when the UGB is expanded? Sam » reply
This is gettting off pointSubmitted by Steve on Thu, 09/11/2008 - 5:33am.
I realize this conversation is straying, but increasing density in a small area will create congestion which wastes resopurces. In addition, Portland has done nothing to encourage large employers like Intel or Nike to create plant inside Portland, so this "sprawl" will be necessary. As a counter, what if we encouraged people to live closer to work rather than rely on transporting themselves over long distances to work? If you look at China, how close to people live to their jobs? I mean someone who lives in Hillsboro (yes, I know they are a backwater) could work at Intel and shop at Tanasbourne and use less resources than someone living in a condo in the Pearl District who works for Intel. » reply
Numara taşınabilirliği,Submitted by Numara taşınabilirliği on Mon, 09/29/2008 - 12:52am.
Numara taşınabilirliÄŸi, cep telefonu kullanıcılarının mevcut numaralarını aynen koruyarak hizmet aldıkları operatörü özgürce deÄŸiÅŸtirebilmeleridir. Bu ÅŸekilde kullanıcılar operatörünü deÄŸiÅŸtirdiklerinde kullandıkları numara 11 hane olarak bütünüyle aynı kalacağından, o döneme kadar kendilerine mevcut numaralarından ulaÅŸmış olan kiÅŸiler aynı ÅŸekilde ulaÅŸmaya devam edebileceklerdir.Numara taşıma Böylece kullanıcılar operatörlerini deÄŸiÅŸtirdiklerinde kendilerine ulaÅŸmalarını istedikleri kiÅŸilere yeni bir numaralarını bildirmek durumunda kalmayacaklardır. » reply
BTWSubmitted by Steve on Mon, 09/08/2008 - 6:57pm.
BTW - Does this mean you are against using public money to build a CC Hotel? How about re-doing PGE Park especially since we just spent $35M on it less than 10 years back and now its not good enough for baseball or soccer? We do have more pressing issues. If it helps, I heard Merritt Paulson and Johna Ashforth are REpublicans. » reply
No, it means...Submitted by Sam Adams on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 1:34am.
...you were incorrect to infer that it was part of my conversation with NWA. I support using public money to build a HQ Hotel if it can be shown to pencil out and benefit our economy. Sam » reply
I apologizeSubmitted by Steve on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 8:35pm.
I apologize, I did not mean to imply PGE Park or CC Hotel would be something MWA cared about. » reply
There are dozens of thingsSubmitted by sascha on Sun, 09/07/2008 - 11:37pm.
There are dozens of things that can come out of a trip to China or any other country for that matter: Chinese tourists are swarming across the globe with pockets full of cash -- they are more and more interested in the natural, unspoiled place of the planet eg NW USA -- this reflects the destruction of their own unspoiled places ... which leads to number 2: cities across China are now looking to green, organic and sustainable development options. This has come down as a mandate from the central government and has been enthusiastically promoted by the Olympics. Cities like Kunming, Qingdao, Chengdu, Hangzhou etc etc are all looking abroad for partnerships in this industry *green* because they lack the experience and know-how Chinese banks are flush with cash and are tightening their flows in China, which has led to a rush to invest abroad. China has enjoyed billions in FDI over the past 20 years -- maybe now its *our* turn to benefit from outside investment. Portland is a culturally dynamic city and the young Chinese are starving for more input from abroad AND for forums to let their voices be heard -- this might not be a purely economic endeavor, but it is a bond across oceans. And it might be interesting to note that China just recently surpassed France in number of art auctions held and amount of capital generated ... Trips to China or Country X are vital for growing, vibrant towns like Portland because it helps local small businesses diversify, encourages investment, increases social, political and cultural links and helps people across vast spaces realize common dreams, such as the huge 13sqm "Sustainable Green Park and Leisure Village" in south Chengdu that would trip over itself to partner up with a like-minded Oregonian ... » reply
Sam Adams wrote: "Do we useSubmitted by Erik Halstead on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 10:28pm.
Sam Adams wrote: "Do we use the limited transportation resources on hand to better maintain the streets and bridges that already we have in the region; or, do we use our transportation resources to build news streets and roads" It's interesting that this is said, because Mr. Adams has repeatedly dodged my concerns over the state of the bus system here in Portland. So, with limited transportation resources on hand, do we: 1. Build more expensive-to-build Streetcar lines which serve little transportation need, and exist primarily to subsidize developers, 2. Build expensive MAX lines which exist specifically to funnel people in and out of the suburbs (case in point, Orenco Station, a development which 15 years ago was prime farmland), 3. Revitalize our existing bus system with new, friendly, easy to use, comfortable, modern busses, along with investments in bus stops? We already have a transportation infrastructure of bus lines. Certainly, some of those lines might be worthy for "upgrading" to a Streetcar line. Others could simply use more capacity in the form of clean, hybrid-electric or trolleybus vehicles, potentially looking at articulated or double-deck vehicles. And some simply need newer vehicles of the same type. We already have bus routes where City of Portland residents wait for the bus on the side of a street without any sidewalks or shoulders. Ride the 43, 44, or 45 lines some time, Mr. Adams, and you'll see the "quality" bus stops that many Southwest Portland residents use each and every day. Come ride the 12 line with me and make sure you bring your running shoes for the sprint across Barbur Boulevard. Or the 54/56/92 line downtown where while there are two gold-plated Streetcar stops within one block of the bus stop, the bus stop is dirt (hope it doesn't rain!) It's nice that you went to China to drum up business, but we need business right here in Oregon. We need investment right here in Oregon. I'd happily forgo half of PDX (and its carbon emissions) in favor of better connections right here in town. It shouldn't be harder for me to get from Southwest Portland to Northeast Portland (15 miles), than to get from Portland to China (thousands of miles). But it seems that the attention given by your office is that of apathy towards the common Portland bus rider. Are we not good enough for your Pearl District lifestyle? Are we not trendy or hip enough? Are we not "Portland" enough for you? I seem to recall that your campaign slogan was "because Portland belongs to all of us". Portland belongs to me too. Unfortunately I do not have the financial ability to live in the Pearl District so I live in Southwest Portland. And I choose to make my environmental impact by riding the bus. I would hope that the City of Portland would take the time to understand the transportation needs of all of us, and include substantial investment in our bus system. The argument that "Portland isn't TriMet" doesn't fly - Portland runs the Streetcar system, so Portland can very well invest in transit for the rest of us. MAX doesn't go everywhere. However, as much as I can do to inform City Hall of the plight of thousands of Portland residents and commuters, I will rest knowing that these comments are systematically ignored because it isn't the will of those who want to invest millions of our dollars into another Streetcar line, while ignoring those who live outside the range of the Streetcar. It's no problem to take our taxdollars but to give it back is a huge questionmark. The Streetcar neighborhoods weren't asked to create a "halo LID" or told that there isn't enough money for sidewalks, despite having paid into property tax accounts for decades. We don't need massive "urban density" developments, "mixed-use developments", or whatever buzzword that is en vogue. We just want to get to and from work, to and from our homes, and to and from the things we need to do. Unfortunately, the message that comes loud and clear from the City of Portland is: "You better own a car. Maybe two or three. Consider a Hummer, because some of your roads are impassible by regular cars." » reply
Post new comment |
PRINT


Get ready Portland
"increase visitor marketing to China and Asia and the world and see Portland on the ground through the eyes of the potential visitor"
That's code for blowing $250M on a convention center hotel and $75M on PGE Park.