BUSINESS JOURNAL: Tax forces VCs to flee PortlandPortland Business Journal - April 13, 2007 A change of heart in Portland City Hall might lure venture capitalists back to Oregon's commercial center, but only if Multnomah County follows suit. The Portland City Council is now working on an exemption to a tax on companies' net income, hoping to persuade venture capital firms to return to the city. But unless Multnomah County enacts a similar exemption, it's unlikely that refugee investment firms, or new ones, will flock to Portland. Firms such as OVP Venture Partners, Mt. Hood Equity Partners LP, Cascadia Partners LLC -- about to be renamed Reference Capital Management -- are all headquartered outside of Portland and Multnomah. Seed-stage fund Northwest Technology Ventures recently moved to Beaverton to escape the dual income taxes. SmartForest Ventures has located its limited-partners entity -- the actual investment fund -- in Lake Oswego, where the Multnomah and Portland taxes don't apply. The entity that manages that fund is located in downtown Portland, and does pay the business income taxes. Capybara Ventures, a seed-stage investment fund that is located within SmartForest's downtown Portland offices, has stayed in Portland because "we are optimistic the city will change its tax structure," said Managing Partner Eric Rosenfeld. If the city and county don't make a change, Capybara would either have to do what SmartForest did, or move entirely out of Portland, to honor its fiduciary responsibility to get the highest possible return for investors, Rosenfeld said. "It's hard to raise institutional venture capital in the only jurisdictions in the country that tax venture capital investors." Portland and Multnomah County have long levied taxes on companies' net income, a practice that puts the region at odds with nearby cities and counties. The tax does not apply to banks, private equity funds and other regulated investment firms. Those sectors are exempt. Not so for VC firms. That's unfair and inconsistent, say local venture capitalists. Adding insult to injury, venture capital firms that have offices in Portland but are headquartered elsewhere don't have to pay the tax. Portland and Multnomah are "discriminating against their own," said Gordon Hoffman, managing director of Northwest Technology Ventures. Beaverton charges a $50 yearly business fee, plus $8.50 per employee per year. Vancouver, Wash., charges $125 per year. Hillsboro, where chipmaking giant Intel Corp. has more than 16,000 employees, has an $80 fee, plus a per-employee fee capped at $830 per year. Portland's minimum fee, at $100 per year, is comparable to surrounding cities' fees. But the tax on net income for companies above a certain revenue level means that some companies are liable for "hundreds of thousands of dollars" in city and county taxes, said Warren Jimenez, senior policy director for City Commissioner Sam Adams. "A small number of payers are paying the majority of the tax," he said. A group of venture capitalists, tax lawyers and tax accountants took their case to Portland's City Council and seem to have been clearly heard. "We are coming up with exemption language, to keep the VCs in Portland," said Jimenez, adding that there's "an appetite" among council members to retain and win back these firms. However eager the City Council may be to welcome venture capitalists, an exemption will do no good unless Multnomah County enacts the same kind. "If Portland does it, I guarantee you we will do it too," said Multnomah County Commissioner Jeff Cogen. County commissioners will vote next week to reduce county business taxes to benefit small companies. The Portland City Council already approved a similar change. Businesses in Portland with gross receipts of less than $50,000 no longer have to pay any business fee at all. Formerly, businesses with less than $25,000 were exempt. Owners of small businesses can now exempt $80,000 in annual compensation from their taxable revenue, up from $60,000. Portland's decision was made easier by a one-time, $30 million revenue surplus. Though Multnomah is faced with a deficit this year, Cogen is confident the county commissioners will replicate Portland's changes, starting in 2008. It's the same story with venture capital firms, said Saltzman. "What about the impact on revenue? If they are gone, there's no revenue at all," he said. Aearnshaw@bizjournals.com | 503-219-3433 Posted Mon, 04/16/2007 - 2:33pm.
[[ Categories: Our Initiatives ]]
Hi, Grant. I am kindaSubmitted by jim karlock on Tue, 04/17/2007 - 11:08am.
Hi, Grant. I am kinda curious if this is just your second post on this or other Portland blogs? I ask because I am starting to suspect a pattern here of a one person using multiple names to give the impression of a lot of different people asking the same question. The real howler is that most of those supposed people won’t give their real name. Reminds me of those city employees Jack caught on his blog (bojack) pushing the city’s agenda while pretending to be ordinary citizens. I even ran into that on a local issues email list. So KNOW that some city employees do things to discredit the city’s critics. Thanks » reply
http://www.grantoberg.comSubmitted by Grant Oberg on Tue, 04/17/2007 - 11:21am.
I've been an avid reader of Sam's blog for a few months, but have never commented. However, you posted a challenge to anyone questioning your ties to post with a real name, and I decided to rise to the challenge. And even if this was just one person posting under different names, you're still dodging the question. Please answer it. -- Grant » reply
GOOD BYE PORTLAND!Submitted by Greg Tompkins on Tue, 04/17/2007 - 11:32am.
My lease is up - I am moving out of this town very soon. If Portland wants to further its radical agendas, then even MORE companies are going to pack up and leave. How many companies already have? Sure, the yuppie coffee shops along the toy train lines won't. I think Portland should apply for its own statehood and then we can re-route I-5 completely around it. Enough is enough! Impeach!! » reply
has stayed in PortlandSubmitted by zilfondel on Mon, 04/23/2007 - 7:59pm.
has stayed in Portland because "we are optimistic the city will change its tax structure," wow. stunning. I guess Oregon IS a state full of dreamers, isn't it? Considering out pitiful VC numbers, it would be a good thing to get some $$$ in here. Considering that the world's 5th largest economy is on our southern border (California trumps the UK), and Seattle and Vancouver to the north, it shouldn't be hard to attract some greenbacks to Oregon companies. » reply
Post new comment |
PRINT


We don't need any stinkin,
We don't need any stinkin, greedy, capitalist firms in Portland - we can get along just fine with green companies. I'll bet those stinking, greedy, capitalists even drive cars!
We need bike makers, not semiconductor makers. Bikes are green.
We need windmill factories, not venture capital. Wind mills are green (well, except for an occasional spotted owl.)
For the greedy capitalists: taxem to the max.
What are you thinking by letting them get out of paying their fair share of taxes to support tax free high density housing and yuppie playgrounds?
Just joking - all of the above is complete BS (except that the yuppie playground is all too true)
Thanks
JK