Neighborhood Parking Benefit Program Generates Mixed ReactionsSam knew this was a controversial idea. Putting parking meters in a Neighborhood Business District in order to generate revenues to reinvest back into the District was the topic of the book "The High Cost of Free Parking" by UCLA Professor Donald Shoup. Sam first heard this idea at the 2005 Railvolution Conference. Sam realized that this could be an opportunity to improve our City's parking management. Demand for on-street parking to access neighborhood businesses exceeds supply. That means we need to be vigilant about ensuring effective parking turnover. The proposed addition of parking meters, which are proven to increase turnover, would make parking more efficient. Another reason for consideration is that we are in a transportation funding crisis. With the current lack of funding for deteriorating transportation infrastructure as well as the many unmet safety needs in our Neighborhood Business District, Sam thought this idea was worth community consideration. Initially proposed the idea of a Parking Benefit Program to North Portland (St. Johns) and the Southeast Corridor (Belmont, Hawthorne, Division and Clinton). Sam wanted to be clear about the conditions to have this conversation:
What was the feedback from the community? North Portland was interested but did not implement the program because there wasn't sufficient parking demand in the district. In the Southeast Corridor, the Hawthorne Business District and the surrounding neighborhoods were concerned that it would drive away customers. They were clear in expressing that Hawthorne would lose their identity if they were to implement this program. In the end, the community decided against implementation. Community Partners
Media Mentions
Weblogs
Posted Thu, 02/08/2007 - 10:07am.
[[ Categories: 2006 Year-in-Review | Good Government | Jobs & Economy | Livability & Environment | North Portland | Office of Transportation | Our Initiatives | Southeast Portland (inner) ]]
Post new comment |
PRINT


And this title const
And this title constitutes the right to impose upon all others an obligation, not otherwise laid upon them, to abstain from the use of certain objects of our free choice, because we have already taken them into our possession. What this article has succeeded in doing is uncovering a few of those pivotal problems lurking undeniably behind the perfect veneer of the society More has described; and these problems have proved themselves significant. On this supposition, freedom would so far be depriving itself of the use of its voluntary activity, in thus putting useable objects out of all possibility of use.