Home | Sam's Calendar | Sam's Priorities | Sam's Portfolio | I Want To... | Your Neighborhood | Archives

Magazine: What happened to black San Francisco?

From San Francsco Magazine:

Once home to the famous Fillmore and a thriving black middle class, San Francisco has suffered the steepest drop in African American population of any major U.S. city-and no longer has enough black residents to fill the seats in Monster Park. As their progeny disperses, the matriarchs and patriarchs of prominent families fight on in a traumatized Bayview, the last black community in what's supposed to be one of the greatest cities on earth...[Read the full article]

Also, recently in The Washington Post:

In Parts of U.S. Northwest, a Changing Face:
Economics Drive White Gentrification of Core Black Neighborhoods of Seattle and Portland

PORTLAND, Ore. -- Already the whitest major city in America, Portland is rapidly becoming even whiter at its core.

"The heart of the black community is gone," said Charles Ford, 76, a black activist whose neighborhood in Portland has flipped in recent years from majority black to majority white. "There ain't no center anymore."

Charles Ford, a longtime resident of Portland, Ore., talks with new neighbor Tara Heiggelke. Gentrification is altering neighborhood demographics.

About 150 miles north in Seattle, the nation's second-whitest major city, the same process of downtown demographic bleaching is accelerating for the same reasons...[Read the full article]

 

Thoughts?


[[ Categories: | | ]]

Where is the news

Where is the news here?
Restrict the supply of a commodity and the price goes up and the poor cannot afford it. In Oregon that commodity is buildable land and it is restricted by government policy, not by nature.

How many readers of this blog feel good about driving the poor out of Portland and eventually out of Oregon. That is what our land use policies are doing. Of course it is even worse in California. (BTW, if I remember right Seattle has some sort of Berlin wall like Portland)

Thanks
JK


Missing something

Homes near the urban core have not always been the priciest homes in the region. NE Portland just 15-20 years ago had nearly 2,000 abandoned homes. This had little to do with buildable land.

Historically black neighborhoods are changing because of a reignited interest by those with money to live closer to the urban core. The market affordable rental housing, once found in abundance close in, is moving to the suburbs.

You fail to acknowledge that people's interest drive a market as well--and I believe that interst is what's inflated much of housing nationwide. Not just buildable land.


As far as interest goes,

As far as interest goes, black people are still interested in living in North and North East Portland. The black community in Portland has significant historical roots in the area and it is a travesty that black Portlanders are being forced to live elsewhere - yes, forced, because they are not choosing to relocate to the outer suburbs because they think Gresham in the place to be, but because of a lack of affordable housing in the area. It is a sad but consistant fact in our society that the interests of the priveledged outweigh the interests of the working class. As a native of North East, it is where I would like to be living now, and it is where I would like to eventually buy a house and raise a family. However, I currently live in Southwest because I have experienced first hand the reality that rent is cheaper the farther out of Portland you get, and worry about my ability to afford a house in the neighborhood where I grew up in the future. And in the event that I am someday able to afford a house there, I am concerned that the cultural fabric of the neighborhood will be drastically different from what it was.


Well said, Rashelle. Indeed,

Well said, Rashelle. Indeed, it is the interest of those wealthy enough to affect the market that have moved affordable housing elsewhere.


It's the artificial shortage of land.

Jesse Beason Homes near the urban core have not always been the priciest homes in the region. NE Portland just 15-20 years ago had nearly 2,000 abandoned homes. This had little to do with buildable land.
That was 20 years ago, before the UGB started to squeeze land prices. Land is not going for close to a million an acre in Tigard. That is $115,000 for a standard 5000 sq ft lot. That should be close to the entire price of house and lot, but it is only for the land. Now build a house on it. But you usually don’t put a $100,000 house on a $115,000 piece of land, so you put up a more expensive house and end up with ½ mil.
See The Planning Penalty at www.ti.org for what $150,000 buys in a free market.

Jesse Beason Historically black neighborhoods are changing because of a reignited interest by those with money to live closer to the urban core. The market affordable rental housing, once found in abundance close in, is moving to the suburbs.
JK: With the suburbs inflated by Metro’s artificial shortage of land, the inner city is inflated even more. That is what is driving out the poor. Remove the UGB and you get $150,000 houses in the burbs and an affordable inner city. Based on the The Planning Penalty I am guessing that renters are paying over $200 per month in inflated rents due to the same planner’s blunders (Metro’s artificial shortage of land.) Do you like paying an extra couple of hundred per month for the UGB?

Jesse Beason You fail to acknowledge that people's interest drive a market as well--and I believe that interst is what's inflated much of housing nationwide. Not just buildable land.
JK: That is the standard line the planners feed people all over the country after they destroy housing affordability. It is a lie.

Thanks
JK


In a word, gentrification.

In a word, gentrification. Just like here.


Hence the reason for

Hence the reason for the strictness of punishment for any deviance whatsoever from the social rule: laws must be obeyed to the utmost in order that no cracks are allowed to appear in the system or its inhabitants. Reason wills that this shall be recognised as a valid principle, and it does so as practical reason: and it is enabled by means of this postulate a priori to enlarge its range of activity in practice. Whether or not this extreme conclusion is justified, we must acknowledge that the elements which lead to its formulation are undeniably present in Utopia.


Unabashed Racism

If articles were published bemoaning a decrease in the size of white neighborhoods due to an influx of black homebuyers the cries of "Racism!" would be deafening, accompanied by exaggerated expressions of self-righteous indignation. How dare those nasty white people fail to embrace diversity! Blue-eyed devils!
Here the apparently voluntary dissolution of a homogenous black neighborhood in San Francisco is mourned as a great tragedy while the "whiteness" of Portland and Seattle is presented as if it was a plague.
Clearly forming racially homogenous communities is just fine, but only if you aren't white.
So much for your mantle of assumed moral superiority. Hello, hypocrites.
I think the days of whites jumping when you people cry "racist" are coming to an end since you don't even bother to hide your own racism any more.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options