Fifty years?? What is the basis for this estimated life of the tram? Is this based on actual experience elsewhere, or just a guess?
Also - isn't there a lot that's been left out of this analysis? Interest? Land? City Staff time? What else is not in this "life cycle cost analysis"?
Why not get an independent analysis? Wouldn't it make the anser more credible?
re: Tram Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Fifty years?? What is the basis for this estimated life of the tram? Is this based on actual experience elsewhere, or just a guess?
Also - isn't there a lot that's been left out of this analysis? Interest? Land? City Staff time? What else is not in this "life cycle cost analysis"?
Why not get an independent analysis? Wouldn't it make the anser more credible?