Home | Sam's Calendar | Sam's Priorities | Sam's Portfolio | I Want To... | Your Neighborhood | Archives

re: The Costs of Stopping the Tram

Stephen and Ledbury:

I think Ledbury is making the point that even though a present zoning/comp. plan may designate a certain building height, that it can change in the future and sometime in the very near future. Consider how NM changed from 35-65 ft. heights to 325 ft in one swope.

It could be argued that for Lair Hill property owners that maybe in 25 year their zoning heights could be changed to 150 ft. But those property owners directly along Gibbs wouldn't be able to enjoy those same rights because of the tram car/cable heights being less than the 150 ft. Those property owners or successors would be harmed financially by devalued property not equal to nearby or adjacent property owners.That is one basis of the lawsuit potentially pending.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Featured videos

Watch it larger here

Watch it larger here

Get Our Updates



Sam's Snapshots

Damn Paparazzi!The Other Great Bridge Leon Moisseiff Designed, North Portland
Would Rather Eat Worms Than Beg, SE PortlandBike Meditation Center




Syndicate

Syndicate content