Home | Sam's Calendar | Sam's Priorities | Sam's Portfolio | I Want To... | Your Neighborhood | Archives

There are many holes in this review.

Switching from land application to biofuel generation reduces our reliance on petroleum products. That's a big plus. As a matter of fact, it was one of the primary benefits that this City Council used to justify switching to biodeisel to fuel city vehicles. The analysis doesn't discuss this important benefit of biofuel generation.

Land application of sewage-derived biosolids is harmful to the environment and to human health. In addition to the viable pathogens, there are many other harmful compounds contained in our sewage plant waste, including heavy metals and many other toxic compounds. The practice of land-applying this waste as fertilizer for grasses that are consumed by cattle, ultimately bound for human consumption as milk and meat, is a dangerous practice. The fact that this is allowed by the current regulatory regime, is cold comfort to those who know better.

There are many other "externalities" that need to be brought into a thoughful analysis. Sam - send these guys back to the drawing board, and demand a tuly comprehensive analysis.


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options