Home | Sam's Calendar | Sam's Priorities | Sam's Portfolio | I Want To... | Your Neighborhood | Archives

To start with, autos are

To start with, autos are subsidized much more than mass transit.
Care to offer substantiation for that claim? I found just the opposite in a reputable journal - see DebunkingPortland.com/Roads/Docs/Delucchi_Chart.htm

If both mass transit users and private auto users were forced to internalize the costs of their chosen transportation alternative, MT would win in a landslide, but I digress
Care to offer substantiation for that claim? I found just the opposite: DebunkingPortland.com/Transit/Cost-Cars-Transit(2005).htm

You are worried about where we are wasting our money but don't mention the massive human and financial sinkhole located in Iraq?
Since mass transit uses more energy than cars (per passenger-mile), how can mass transit help the Iraq situation?
DebunkingPortland.com/Transit/BusVsCarTEDB.htm

Thanks
JK


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Featured videos

Watch it larger here

Watch it larger here

Get Our Updates



Sam's Snapshots

Pipes and CrackedFoundation, North Portland
A "Zebra" Seeks Shelter From the Rain, Downtown PortlandThe Eastside is Not Featherweight, Gateway Transit Center, NE Portland




Syndicate

Syndicate content