Home | Sam's Calendar | Sam's Priorities | Sam's Portfolio | I Want To... | Your Neighborhood | Archives

I think that the case argues

Submitted by Jesse Beason on Mon, 02/26/2007 - 9:48am.

I think that the case argues that as PERS is an employee benefit afforded to state and other municipal employees, the rights contained within that benefit--including the division of assets--need to comply with the court's earlier ruling in Tanner.


»

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
More information about formatting options

Featured videos

Watch it larger here

Watch it larger here

Get Our Updates


Sam's Snapshots

Not Air But Craft on Burnside, West Burnside, PortlandSome Assembly Required
A Local Superhero Staffs the Help Line, Outside In, SW PortlandFlag Football in Lents Park, East Portland




Syndicate

Syndicate content